Google Analytics is a powerful tool that tracks and analyzes website traffic for informed marketing decisions.
Service URL: policies.google.com (opens in a new window)
__utmx
Used to determine whether a user is included in an A / B or Multivariate test.
18 months
_ga
ID used to identify users
2 years
_gali
Used by Google Analytics to determine which links on a page are being clicked
30 seconds
_ga_
ID used to identify users
2 years
_gid
ID used to identify users for 24 hours after last activity
24 hours
_gat
Used to monitor number of Google Analytics server requests when using Google Tag Manager
1 minute
__utmb
Used to distinguish new sessions and visits. This cookie is set when the GA.js javascript library is loaded and there is no existing __utmb cookie. The cookie is updated every time data is sent to the Google Analytics server.
30 minutes after last activity
__utmc
Used only with old Urchin versions of Google Analytics and not with GA.js. Was used to distinguish between new sessions and visits at the end of a session.
End of session (browser)
__utmz
Contains information about the traffic source or campaign that directed user to the website. The cookie is set when the GA.js javascript is loaded and updated when data is sent to the Google Anaytics server
6 months after last activity
__utmv
Contains custom information set by the web developer via the _setCustomVar method in Google Analytics. This cookie is updated every time new data is sent to the Google Analytics server.
2 years after last activity
_gac_
Contains information related to marketing campaigns of the user. These are shared with Google AdWords / Google Ads when the Google Ads and Google Analytics accounts are linked together.
90 days
__utma
ID used to identify users and sessions
2 years after last activity
__utmt
Used to monitor number of Google Analytics server requests
10 minutes
📱Personal Preference: Apple or Android?
I have always been an android kid all my life due to its affordability and accessibility such that regardless of the electronic brand, there is a sort of seamless connectivity between android to android phones whereas apple brands are far more enclosed and isolated only within their products. Though having admitted that I have only ever experienced life through the lens of an android user, I still cannot deny the timeless aesthetic Apple carries in the market. From its clean user interface and sleek designs, it boasts a better user experience simply from its physical appearance.
Looking at it in a more in-depth light and delivering an objective comparison, the following are some of the significant distinctions between the two operating systems dominating the market:
> Customizability – Android provides more freedom and far more options/possibilities for customization and thus enabling a user to totally personalize their devices. On the other hand, Apple devices have user interfaces that are more simple, presiding within a theme, and are far more consistent among users.
> Hardware (Ecosystem) – many electronic companies and brands utilize the Android operating system, thus allowing users a wider collection of smartphones/devices to choose from, all with differing features, price points, and sizes to choose from. Though Apple only manufactures iPhones/iPads, which compress one’s options but likewise provide a more seamless and consistent hardware experience.
> More Apps/ App store – Apple has always been known for its tedious app approval process such that each authorized app now present in the apple store has been through a careful selection method to ensure a more stable and secure experience for its users. Android, though has a broader app ecosystem (due to its open-source operating system, which to some may be beneficial), could also be the root for unreliable or unsecured apps hosting viruses, etc.
The choice of which hails supreme is more attributed to personal preference, and for me, I would still choose android.
🖥️ Available LIS on the market for purchase for clinical laboratories
From the data gathered in Capterra, they compared three different LISs available on the market, each with different pros and cons. Out of the given comparison, Avalon Laboratory System ($15,000.00/one time) and Dendi LIS (no price listed but offers a free trial) certainly followed through with a standard.
Both systems have identical features (audit management, calibration management, Data Security, EMR/EHR, Lab Instruments Integration, Lab Order Management, Sample Management & Test panels), were easy to use, had astounding customer service, and were certainly good value for one’s money. But out of all reviews, Dendi LIS was the highest rated and is greatly recommended by those who had experienced/encountered the system.